Beijing picks their next puppet for Hong Kong

Beijing picks their next puppet for Hong Kong

Leung Chun-ying is out. Having tried and failed to control Hong Kong’s blossoming Democracy movement, the puppet masters in Beijing have decided to switch puppets.

The new guy, Hong Kong’s Financial Secretary John Tsang, won’t be any different — because he won’t be any more of a decision maker than the last puppet was.

This is why people like Democracy, and hate Communism and/or dictatorships, among many other reasons.

Here’s a bit about Tsang from AFP —

HONG KONG: Hong Kong’s finance chief resigned Monday (Dec 12) ahead of what is widely expected to be a tilt at the city leadership.

John Tsang – nicknamed “Mr Pringles” by local media for his resemblance to the crisp brand’s mascot – is seen as a more moderate alternative to current leader Leung Chun-ying, who said Friday he would step down in July.

The city has become sharply divided under Leung, whose term has been marked by anti-Beijing protests. Opponents cast him as a puppet of the Chinese government squeezing the semi-autonomous city’s freedoms.

Tsang confirmed to reporters Monday evening that he had resigned after more than nine years, but stopped short of announcing he would run for the leadership.

“I shall think through this in the coming days and make an announcement,” he said.

He used the opportunity to thank the Chinese government for their “support and encouragement” as well as the people of Hong Kong.

Tsang recapped how he had witnessed the city returned to “our motherland” – referring to the handover of Hong Kong from Britain to China in 1997.

He also said that Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy had been “successfully implemented”.

The finance secretary’s resignation is being seen as a signal that he will stand in the leadership elections in March. Candidates are not allowed to hold a government office if they want to stand for chief executive. Although Tsang has a better public image than Leung, he is still an establishment figure.

Pro-democracy campaigners have warned the next city leader will simply be another Beijing yes-man as the vote system is skewed. The chief executive is chosen by an electoral committee made up of representatives of special interest groups, weighted towards Beijing.

Advertisements

About karlspain

20 year Newspaperman. Lifelong Inventor. Wrote 2 books so far, working on more. The Revelation, 1st book, about your brain & the universe, and math. Hooked together! God I trust, America I love, 2nd book, is the biography of Aris Mardirossian, a great man. Also owned a software company, an IT integration company, a gas station and a fuzzy logic software title along the way.
This entry was posted in China invades Taiwan, China vs U.S., Chinese Economy, Chinese Navy, Constitution, Constitutional Democracy, George Washington, Hong Kong Democracy Movement, Love letter to China, Trump, Uncategorized, War. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Beijing picks their next puppet for Hong Kong

  1. play4keeps says:

    David A. Andelman , editor emeritus of World Policy Journal and a member of the board of contributors of USA Today, is the author of “A Shattered Peace: Versailles 1919 and the Price We Pay Today.” The opinions expressed in this commentary are his.

    (CNN)Just in case Donald Trump missed the signals from Beijing about how significant it views any tilt toward Taiwan, China flew a nuclear-capable Xian H-6 bomber into the South China Sea this weekend, then had one of its trusted newspapers point out that ditching the 40-year-old “one China” policy would touch off “a real crisis.” [image: David A. Andelman] <img alt=”David A. Andelman” class=”media__image” src=” http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/160715132928-david-andelman-hedshot-large-169.jpg “> David A. Andelman The latest messages from Beijing were a direct response to comments from the President-elect on Sunday that “I fully understand the ‘one China’ policy, but I don’t know why we have to be bound by a ‘one China’ policy unless we make a deal with China having to do with other things, including trade.” Since the United States first opened relations with the communist government on the mainland in 1979, relations between the two powers have been conducted with the understanding that Taiwan was a province of a single China. Anything less was quite simply unacceptable.

    Throughout his career, Donald Trump has been, often quite literally, rolling the dice — seeing just how far he could push a foe to get what he really wants. Still, this time, before we embark on a game of chicken with China, it might be a good idea to think about who has the most to lose. The stakes are far broader and deeper than a single business deal or trade pact. What the President-elect also needs to recognize is the fragile nature of China itself that makes Taiwan and the “one China” policy so vitally important to its survival. Eight-thousand miles from New York, Taiwan looks to be just another little chess piece off the coast of the Asian mainland. But for China, Taiwan and its status is an existential issue. Read More When you start peeling away the layers of the onion, China is not a single monolithic power run from Beijing. It is a collection of vastly divergent regions and nationalities, assembled into a single nation over the course of a millennium. [image: Trump's picking a fight with China he cannot afford to lose] <img alt=”Trump's picking a fight with China he cannot afford to lose” class=”media__image” src=”http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/161212112322-china-rising-defence-spending-large-169.jpg”> Trump’s picking a fight with China he cannot afford to lose It is still at the mercy of a host of powerful centrifugal forces that at any moment could threaten to spin the nation apart: 56 ethnic minorities and religions from Buddhist Tibetans and Mongols to Muslim Uyghurs, each with its own region, demands and desires. Taiwan is just one such region. But if Taiwan can successfully defy Beijing and break away, what chance is there for the communists to hold the rest in check? In short a “one China” policy is a life or death matter for the rulers of Beijing. Donald Trump appears to be holding a carefully nuanced and balanced “one China” policy that has been respected by eight American presidents hostage to “other things.” But China does not react well to a diplomatic or financial gun to its head. And the stakes go far beyond tariffs and trade. The United States relies on China and its good faith even more than China relies on us. So, it would be well worth it for the President-elect and his advisers to reflect on just what we need China for these days, and which Taiwan can do little or nothing to help. In the geopolitical area, we need China to keep North Korea’s nuclear and long-range missile programs in check. It could be said, as Trump has suggested, that China hasn’t done much in this respect. But so far, North Korea has hardly shown itself capable of producing a deliverable nuclear warhead or vehicle. Moreover, as that nation’s nearest neighbor, China certainly has its own good reasons for making sure its nuclear ambitions are contained. Both the United States and China need to cooperate in this respect — neither nation wants a failed state in this critical part of the world. Equally, the United States and our many allies and friends in Asia want China to exercise some restraint in strategically important areas of the South China Sea. Allies we have long cared deeply about — from tiny, oil-rich Brunei to Australia, Japan and the Philippines — in their turn care deeply about keeping China within bounds in Asia, and having an America prepared to do its utmost to avoid confrontation in their backyard. Views on the Trump Transition

    Beyond Asia, China has proven to be an increasingly reliable partner with the United States and Western Europe in some critical issues: ratifying the freeze on Iran’s’ nuclear weapons program and restraining its use of the veto in critical UN Security Council votes. If the United States and Russia are to reach some accord on Syria that would allow a full-bore pursuit of ISIS in the Middle East, having an obstreperous China would hardly be useful. Then, there’s trade and finance, where Trump believes he needs to bludgeon China into submission. But will that work? Hardly likely. First, China has every reason to keep viable, indeed thriving, financial channels open to the United States. First, it is the world’s largest single holder of US Treasury securities, with $1.157 trillion worth on hand, a number that has fallen by nearly $100 billion in the past year. If the Trump administration is going to embark on an even more vigorous program of public works, it will need foreign customers for its bonds, but especially will want to make sure China doesn’t unload any more of its existing horde. Follow CNN Opinion

    The breadth and depth of the Chinese-American relationship is hard to overstate. Over the next 20 years, Boeing believes, China will be buying some $1 trillion worth of planes. It wants the lion’s share of those orders. But China does have alternatives, particularly the European Airbus consortium that would be happy to step in. That all represents a whole lot of jobs and a lot of help to our trade deficit. This year alone, Boeing is filling more than $11 billion in orders from China, 163 planes. China is also the fastest growing market for American films and will likely pass the United States in box office revenues next year. The three largest categories of Chinese purchases from the United States — soybeans, cars and aircraft — are all critical components of the American economy and all easily sourced elsewhere. Already, China has made its views quite clear. There is much, up to and including world peace, that hinges on America’s continued respect for the “one China” policy. Taiwan and the Trump administration need to understand this, and quickly, before this longstanding and mutually profitable relationship goes hurtling off the rails.

    • karlspain says:

      David, I agree with a lot of your well thought out positions, except it leaves a free people that choose their laws and leaders democratically, under the Communist thumb. I agree with you that the Chinese are much weaker domestically than externally. All the more reason the only source of credible information to hundreds of millions of mainland Chinese be maintained, which means a continued free Taiwan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s